https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/super-league-emergency-meeting-crisis-30415509 Like I’ve explained before, not sure on here though, Salford are out with the begging bowl. The club are owned now by supporters and last year begged them to buy shares, which they did and cleaned out their fans, then they got the council to give them money to pay bills, then they got the council to buy the ground and will let them play for peanuts there. Now they need an advancement on RFL monies to continue to pay staff including players. They should be made to sort their own mess, sell players or whatever is needed. Or sport doesn’t have enough in reserves to do this and if they do it for one, they must do it for all.

I am broadly in agreement with you @RaoulDuke if they’re not capable of self-managing the season (again) then they’re not fit for SL I am afraid. That should be a minimum requirement. Our own club, and others have suffered on the field for financial issues and had to operate within parameters. As should Salford.

Surely that should knock the grade IMG gave to the club as they’re not financially stable and as such Toulouse would probably be promoted? Becoming a yearly thing where Salford are the ones always asking for advances on cash. At some point you have to wonder if they’re viable.

Matt Last year we cut out cloth to suit our needs and ensure our survival under IMG,we made a conscious decision to run with a weaker squad for what proved to be the greater good. Salford seemed neither able or more importantly willing to compromise on field performances for financial security and now for the umpteenth time they’re suffering the consequences. You only have to look at their retentions and signings for next season to see they’re not learning from their mistakes and will be relying on hand outs once again to survive. As a club using this model they are unsustainable,

RaoulDuke Its almost like they are following the old Wakefield business plan isnt it

mdean we’ve suffered on the field as we’ve had stadium requirements to hit. The frightening thing now is that when we do our rebuild, we’ll lose points and may lose our place in the league. So I guess, don’t do the work and stay in but thats not the aim of the IMG rules. Between a rock and hard place. I’m expecting the rules to change and less impetus on being the first call on use of your ground but better facilities.

pirate true. As long as we follow the rules we should be OK.

RaoulDuke Attendances will be vital for our score again,there are still a few tweaks we can use to gain points such as the LED advertising boards and I thought MJ had held back on some investment so we wouldn’t drop what we gained this year,could be wrong on that one. With regard to Salford be interesting to see what’s announced Monday,can’t believe they’re doing this after the signings they announced,mind if they have to have a fire sale 😉

Hepworth Watkins & Bullock please!

Salford have played a blinder, waiting for the fixtures to be announced so they cant be punished correctly without causing serious disruptions. In my opinion they should be booted and the next high grade team promoted CTID

Salford have put out a statement moaning about the release of their begging. The other clubs are going to make a decision Monday. They blame the slow local council for not allowing them to play quicker at their virtual rent free stadium and earn sponsorship whilst their council are closing services to do it.

Salford again

Hepworth

Danny Wilson has confirmed we’re interested in Ormonroyd so we’ve obviously got enough cap space to bring him in,wouldn’t be the worst signing and at least he’s proven at this level. Him aside can’t see us picking up anyone else unless they’re in the bargain basement. It’s taken long enough probably too long for Salford to see some consequences to their actions. Had they been taken sooner this may have been avoided because you can’t exactly say their financial woes have gone under the radar. Still they’ve signed well in the off season and have still managed a warm weather camp in Portugal,I would think most folks idea of cutting costs and Salfords differ slightly.

Maturecasfan

Would we have to pay a fee for Ormondroyd.

RaoulDuke

Depends really. They have to save 800k.so if all players contracted was 100k, they need to get rid of 8 to do that. If they get rid of 4 then they have to make up the rest with a fee.

Ultimately they will have players they can do without our maybe get the 800k out of the way with a few players. Sneyd will be on 200k or certainly that’s what he could get close to at hull I’d have thought.

« Previous Page